RECALCITRATION:
Decided Law [res judicata]
is DEAD. Memorizing a lawbrary hath no force or effect
to move the oligarchy of sophists [judges in black robes] to support anything
they don’t wish to support. Honor dies
where interest lies. Oligarchs are not
bound by law, they are the law! Judges are
expressly forbidden from legislating by the separation of powers but
that doesn’t stop ‘em; hell, it didn’t and doesn’t
even slow them down!
The Separation of Powers is a scam as long as the only things partitioning the powers of
government are cultural icons and bombastic verbiage. When judges tell juries: "The court will
decide the law, and the jury will decide the facts." they are employing a
euphemistic metonymy to usurp the sovereignty from the Populace. Is the law a “fact” or not? To say “the court will decide” really means
the judge will decide, and deciding what the law is, is the very definition of
legislating. Judges know full well they are
expressly prohibited from legislating.
Can you say: “Open Perfidy”? I am saying it!
Can judges be excused by saying
they are unaware they are legislating when deciding what the law is? No, “ignorantia legis neminem excusat”
[ignorance of law excuses no one] goes at least triple for judges.
Inherent in “sovereignty” is
the power
to legislate, i.e., to decide what the laws are. At one time legislative power was solely the
king’s. “The king’s word is law!” -
Blackstone. Magna Charta diluted that power of
legislation, parliamentary government diluted it further, and the American
Revolution was spoz’ta, once and for
all, secure sovereignty to the People as protected by "The Separation of
Powers"; but no, as Ben Franklin put it, “The price of
That’s my rumination and I’m stickin’ to it!
Peace, Sanity Clause RE [Rascal Emeritus]
BACK to- http://www.sanityclause.com/