Perfidy:

 

Legend has it the trust of the American People, i.e. their consent to be governed, was reposed in “our government” by the ratification of the Constitution for the United States of America ... but whether or not the American Public still empower the US Government with our trust, and whether or not it is trustworthy, are issues today. Personally, I find it ridiculous to think people who are long dead should or could have power to insist I trust in anything or anyone.  “The Earth belongs in usufruct to the living-” – Thomas Jefferson [“usufruct” = Roman Civil Law meaning basically, “Use it but don’t screw it up.”]   Too: because there is no way to assess the integrity of the election history says ratified the US Constitution in the first instance, it follows the issue of the Colonists’ ratification is moot at best in any case. The dead cannot decide for my living mind; and I think if you are letting the dead make decisions for you, you don’t have minds of your own. It is altogether fitting and proper to give the Framers and the Colonists full benefit of the doubt that their intentions were good, but they cannot govern the living from their graves; those folks were not saints or prophets of God, they were human and made mistakes.

 

“The People” have never been 100% behind anything any government has done; there have always been dissenters, neither has dissenting opinion always been in the wrong.  History is rife with righteous rebellions, and the American Revolution owes its birth as much to the Lutheran Revolution’s rebellion against the lies and tyrannies of the Roman Catholic Church as it does to any other historical event or philosophical meandering.

 

As I heard it, and so the story goes, the US Gummint was established in ministerial special trust to operate within the paradigm of its constitution de jure [as written], and is not a blind or discretionary trust wherein trustees may do as they please ad hoc.  The de facto state of affairs evinces deviation from our Constitution many times, namely: 1) The illegal wars, a.k.a. murder; 2) De facto [“President,” “Justice” etc.] and medieval [“czar” etc.] Titles of Nobility in common usage; 3) Congress no longer coining or regulating the Value of money; 4) So-called public servants in positions of trust accepting presents, emoluments, and Titles (however honorific) from foreign sources without the consent of Congress, to name a few; supported by sophistries, and justified by necromancy!

 

When the United States Supreme Court [metonymy meaning the Justices sitting that “judicial” office] reaches back through the mists of time and interprets the intentions of the Framers rather than the Constitution itself, is that a judicial function or necromancy? The dead cannot speak, even via proxies ... so when the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court profess to be speaking for the Framers of the U.S. Constitution they are practicing necromancy, saying we the living are ruled by the dead, and that they have legal licensed authority to represent moldering corpses and practice law for them! It is no surprise to me this practice invariably allows what the Constitution expressly prohibits...

 

A fountain can rise no higher than its source. The Constitution for the United States of America twice expressly limits the power of Congress to the establishment of tribunals which are “inferior” to the Supreme Court. This is stated in plain English and does not require official interpretation to be understood. Whether the people of the United States may interpret our own Constitution is not the question, whether or not we are capable and qualified to understand it may not be questioned; as the presumption of the knowledge of the law attends every prosecution, and ignorance of the law excuses not! The Supreme Court that appointed George Dubya Bush to the presidency was established as a “judicial court” [Statutes at Large, Vol. I, page 73 ] but valid elections are decided by counting the ballots, not by quasi judicial edict.

 

I view US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissenting opinion in Bush v Gore as pure hype meant to provide a fallback position: “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” If his Honor [de facto Title of Nobility] had really been so outraged by the dictatorial hubris of his fellow Justices he would have resigned, disassociated himself from them, and returned to private life but he didn’t. “Birds of a feather flock together” – Anon, and Justice John Paul Stevens can go flock himself too!

 

"It is, Sir, the people's Constitution, the people's government, made for the people, made by the people, and answerable to the people." - Daniel Webster (1782 - 1852 A.D.) That means it is not the judicial Supreme Court’s Constitution, not made for that judicial body, not made to be understandable and interpreted solely by the Justices of the judicial Court, nor is allowing those Justices to be above the law judicial by any means.

 

 

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.

But it cannot survive treason from within.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero

“A rogue judiciary is not only antithetical to constitutional government; it is a treasonous usurpation of our right to representative government paid for by the blood of patriots. It doesn’t matter whether the war against our hard-won right to equal justice under law is waged by force of arms or foisted upon us by color of office, the intent and resulting treasonous usurpation is manifestly the same.” – Sanity Clause RE

“Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it

wants, is the liberty of appearing.” – Thomas Paine

"So there!" – Antonin Scalia, ironically...

 

Barack Obama, a tenured professor of law, knows this shit; he is therefore knowingly complicit in all this shit. [pardon the necessary expletive] The con's-piracy is pandemic.

 

Unscrewing the inscrutable, Sanity Clause RE [Rascal Emeritus] © 2009